Yes it was. And here's a thorough study and investigation from a credible source:
(If you'd like to know a little more about the video before committing two hours of your time, look past the jump below)
Let me preface this by saying, the video starts with a little bit of speculation, and Richard Gage (the orator) does not specifically say it is speculation. It should just be obvious to the viewer which parts (pretty much only the first 5-6 minutes) are speculation and which are not.
And feel free to visit his site, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
Continue reading "Was 9/11 a controlled ... »
Sunday, September 27. 2009
KNOW YOUR RIGHT TO RESIST UNLAWFUL ARREST
I do not suggest resisting arrest unless you have a clue. If you, however, know for a certainty that can hold in court, that you are being arrested unlawfully, I SUGGEST YOU RESIST WITH ALL DUE FORCE. You should NEVER put yourself into a position where you are at the mercy of an aggressor.
Source: Constitution.org Continue reading "KNOW YOUR RIGHT TO RESIST ... »
Source: Constitution.org Continue reading "KNOW YOUR RIGHT TO RESIST ... »
Sunday, August 23. 2009
Guide to time travel part 2 (plus Star Trek Transporter death)
So in the last post here, I went over how, as far as I know, there is only one dimension of time. In one dimension of time, time travel is merely rewinding or fast forwarding the history of the universe, and thus you couldn't possibly "change" anything, you would just repeat your actions over and over.
I said, essentially, considering time travel in two dimensions is as good as considering whether or not the invisible pink unicorn exists - it's completely unfounded and pointless.
Well, I got bored enough so I'll explain how time travel STILL doesn't require multiple universes or paradoxes even with two dimensions of time:
First, a quick explanation of how Star Trek transporters work, since no one seems to realize this, and it'll help you understand time travel:
A Star Trek transporter breaks your body down into its elementary particles, records the positions and all, and then recreates you out of separate matter at a separate location. It does not transport you at all, it merely makes a copy. The original you is now dead, and a new one has taken your place. If they were smart, they would use that technology to just create duplicates instead of killing the original ones, but it's a fictional TV show so they can be as stupid as they want.
The point is, though, that the "you" at location B is not the same "you" at location A. It's entirely different matter and physically an entirely different person, you are merely the exact same structure with the exact same memories and thoughts and personality. That's good enough to trick an outside observer, but if you know how the transporter works, you know that using one means your death. Just like time travel: Continue reading "Guide to time travel part 2 ... »
I said, essentially, considering time travel in two dimensions is as good as considering whether or not the invisible pink unicorn exists - it's completely unfounded and pointless.
Well, I got bored enough so I'll explain how time travel STILL doesn't require multiple universes or paradoxes even with two dimensions of time:
First, a quick explanation of how Star Trek transporters work, since no one seems to realize this, and it'll help you understand time travel:
A Star Trek transporter breaks your body down into its elementary particles, records the positions and all, and then recreates you out of separate matter at a separate location. It does not transport you at all, it merely makes a copy. The original you is now dead, and a new one has taken your place. If they were smart, they would use that technology to just create duplicates instead of killing the original ones, but it's a fictional TV show so they can be as stupid as they want.
The point is, though, that the "you" at location B is not the same "you" at location A. It's entirely different matter and physically an entirely different person, you are merely the exact same structure with the exact same memories and thoughts and personality. That's good enough to trick an outside observer, but if you know how the transporter works, you know that using one means your death. Just like time travel: Continue reading "Guide to time travel part 2 ... »
Thursday, August 6. 2009
So I was thinking about this "multiple universes" idea, and I made a guide to time travel
It really seems like they just invented it because they don't understand time travel (into the past). I mean, I get the "photons act like a wave and a particle" thing, but really my point is about time travel (into the past), so ignore the multiple universes concept:
I don't think people grasp time travel (into the past). Traveling through time would be like traveling through length. I can walk left, I can walk right. When I walk left, I am no longer to the right. When I travel backwards through time, I am no longer in the future.
What I mean is, if I traveled 5 minutes into the past right now, thinking, "YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M GOING TO TIME TRAVEL RIGHT NOW TO PROVE MY POINT!", I would lose all memories of those 5 minutes. I would have undone all actions I did. I would unage. Everything would reverse. If a MYSTICAL GODLIKE third person were video recording me, they would see me and my universe in play, and then in reverse, and then I'd be back where I was 5 minutes before.
Now, 5 minutes ago, I would have been like "I think I'm going to make a post about this time travel thing." I would begin writing. After those 5 minutes, I'd be like, "YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M GOING TO TIME TRAVEL RIGHT NOW TO PROVE MY POINT!", and go into the past AGAIN.
[btw, it didn't take me 5 minutes to write to that point irl, it was just an example. >:|]
Continue reading "So I was thinking about this ... »
I don't think people grasp time travel (into the past). Traveling through time would be like traveling through length. I can walk left, I can walk right. When I walk left, I am no longer to the right. When I travel backwards through time, I am no longer in the future.
What I mean is, if I traveled 5 minutes into the past right now, thinking, "YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M GOING TO TIME TRAVEL RIGHT NOW TO PROVE MY POINT!", I would lose all memories of those 5 minutes. I would have undone all actions I did. I would unage. Everything would reverse. If a MYSTICAL GODLIKE third person were video recording me, they would see me and my universe in play, and then in reverse, and then I'd be back where I was 5 minutes before.
Now, 5 minutes ago, I would have been like "I think I'm going to make a post about this time travel thing." I would begin writing. After those 5 minutes, I'd be like, "YOU KNOW WHAT? I'M GOING TO TIME TRAVEL RIGHT NOW TO PROVE MY POINT!", and go into the past AGAIN.
[btw, it didn't take me 5 minutes to write to that point irl, it was just an example. >:|]
Continue reading "So I was thinking about this ... »
Monday, July 27. 2009
"Depression" and the secret to happiness
*************
For as long as I could remember, life was terribly unpleasant (until I discovered the SECRET TO HAPPINESS OMG). It certainly got better as I got older, because of course, the more you understand, the more enjoyable life is. What's more displeasing than frustration? What's more frustrating than a lack of understanding? I suppose that's what's driven me to such lengths to become as logical and understanding as I am now.
Not only that, but the fact that, when you were young, it was impossible to hold a conversation with an adult, because they couldn't pull their heads out of their asses for long enough to consider your ideas. When you asked them to elaborate on something, they assumed you simply didn't understand their reasoning. You hoped you hadn't understood their reasoning, and that there was some validity to it, but you were always disappointed to discover that they were as stupid as you had suspected.
That's not what this article is about, though. I just wanted to counter the, "I wish I were young again", thing that so many people seem to have. I suppose some people aren't tortured by their own lack of understanding, and so they would enjoy being in ignorance, and due to that fact, when they were young, they were as idiotic as the adults assumed they were at any given age.
What this article is about, what I just now, about 2 minutes ago, spontaneously thought to bother writing here, is on how horribly depressed one can become, for years nonstop, and yet not have the physical condition known as depression. ADD is related.
Continue reading ""Depression" and ... »
Thursday, July 23. 2009
Renounce your US Citizenship - Gain rights
I have not considered myself to be a citizen of the United States for a long time now, since mid. 2004 if I am not mistaken. As of Friday July 24th I will be filing a official affidavit renouncing my United States citizenship and my citizenship of all States under the jurisdiction of the United States.
What will I do you ask?
I will be openly and officially announcing my sovereignty. I will change from being a, "United States citizen," and instead become a, "non-citizen national;" meaning that I have pledged an allegiance to the republic of the United States of America to defend all inalienable natural rights.
Let's take a moment to explain how we (citizens of the USA) are able to renounce citizenship and become nationals:
Continue reading "Renounce your US Citizenship ... »
What will I do you ask?
I will be openly and officially announcing my sovereignty. I will change from being a, "United States citizen," and instead become a, "non-citizen national;" meaning that I have pledged an allegiance to the republic of the United States of America to defend all inalienable natural rights.
Let's take a moment to explain how we (citizens of the USA) are able to renounce citizenship and become nationals:
Continue reading "Renounce your US Citizenship ... »
Monday, June 1. 2009
Feed and House Everyone, Today. (Part 2)
After mentioning the Venus project in my last post, I figured I would see if they've done anything new, sense I haven't checked up on them in quite a while. I found a presentation on what the Venus project is about, watched it the whole way through, and it's very thoroughly explained.
If you have an hour and a half, and don't know or don't understand what the Venus project is about, I highly recommend you watch this video:
And here's another link to the Venus Project
If you have an hour and a half, and don't know or don't understand what the Venus project is about, I highly recommend you watch this video:
And here's another link to the Venus Project
Feed and House everyone, today
Today, with our technology, humanity could feed and house every single human on earth, for FREE. There's no magical, religious, or other insanity required to accomplish this relatively simple concept. It all starts with FREE ENERGY (Free as in cost, not as in "energy from nothing"), and I'm going to explain it all, with colorful pictures to keep your attention.
Energy:
How do we produce electricity in such abundance, that it can't be charged?
Oil is NOT the answer, oil always has been (as far as energy is concerned) simply a method of control and power. Oil needs to be transported great distances and then refined in large facilities, for long periods of time. Highly inefficient.
Nuclear power plants (fission and fusion) are NOT the answer either. Today we use Fission to produce electricity in power plants, but the power plants produce huge amounts of toxic and radioactive waste. As with oil, rich people are glad to promote their supposedly efficient power-plants, while investing in the expensive waste removal and treatment systems that are required. Fusion isn't the answer, simply because we don't yet have the technology to produce sustained fusion (at least that's what the government wants you to believe! >.>).
So what IS the answer? The simple and effective RENEWABLE energy sources we've used for years:
-Solar
-Wind
-Hydro
And the new guys:
-Tidal
-Wave
-Geothermal
A well built Solar Array in the right environment will last for centuries, and with no moving parts, require minimal maintenance, while producing no green house gasses, and no waste whatsoever. Wind and Water turbines can last for years and also produce no waste. Well built Tidal and wave generators can also last for centuries, producing energy from the tidal motion of the ocean, and producing no waste.
Continue reading "Feed and House everyone, today" »
Energy:
How do we produce electricity in such abundance, that it can't be charged?
Oil is NOT the answer, oil always has been (as far as energy is concerned) simply a method of control and power. Oil needs to be transported great distances and then refined in large facilities, for long periods of time. Highly inefficient.
Nuclear power plants (fission and fusion) are NOT the answer either. Today we use Fission to produce electricity in power plants, but the power plants produce huge amounts of toxic and radioactive waste. As with oil, rich people are glad to promote their supposedly efficient power-plants, while investing in the expensive waste removal and treatment systems that are required. Fusion isn't the answer, simply because we don't yet have the technology to produce sustained fusion (at least that's what the government wants you to believe! >.>).
So what IS the answer? The simple and effective RENEWABLE energy sources we've used for years:
-Solar-Wind
-Hydro
And the new guys:
-Tidal
-Wave
-Geothermal
A well built Solar Array in the right environment will last for centuries, and with no moving parts, require minimal maintenance, while producing no green house gasses, and no waste whatsoever. Wind and Water turbines can last for years and also produce no waste. Well built Tidal and wave generators can also last for centuries, producing energy from the tidal motion of the ocean, and producing no waste.
Continue reading "Feed and House everyone, today" »
Wednesday, May 13. 2009
Everything in a nutshell
*************
Yes, everything. If you want to read the TL;DR version, scroll to the bottom. If you want to read the explanation to everything, then read the whole post, of course.
At the most elementary level, you must understand that there are two completely true, yet distinct, perspectives from which you may consider anything. You will get different answers to the same question depending on which perspective you are using. If you go into a conversation making an assumption on which perspective the argument is categorized under, or don't understand the categories themselves, there will surely be misunderstandings, and most likely you'll argue over your own miscommunications.
I will call these two perspectives "First person" and "Third person", since that's what they are, lol.
In the Third person, you are nothing but a bit of matter, carrying out a long series of processes as does any other matter in the universe. Death is an arbitrary definition, created by humanity, to explain something which is entirely insignificant. The universe will continue as it was destined to by cause and effect long after you die. This is also known as "Objectivism" (sometimes).
In the First person, the universe began and will end with you. The universe can not exist if you are not there to perceive it. This is also known as "Solipsism".
Like I said, both are true. They are distinct from each other, though, and when you are having a conversation with someone, I suggest (from much personal experience) that you clarify whether you're going to be talking from the Third Person or the First person.
Here's why:
Continue reading "Everything in a nutshell" »
(Page 1 of 1, totaling 9 entries)




